From Home-Sharing to Housing Stability: The Evolution of Upside with Jake Rothstein
It is always a pleasure to welcome back a pioneer who has founded one of the first (and few) tech-enabled housing solutions in the AgeTech ecosystem. When Jake Rothstein and I first spoke years ago, we were exploring the “Golden Girls” co-living concept and the mission to help older adults age in the right place. Fast forward to today, and that mission has evolved into something truly monumental. Upside has transitioned from a boutique home sharing startup into a national infrastructure that treats housing as a critical clinical intervention. In this episode, Jake shares the incredible arc of that journey – how they’ve built a network of 33,000+ apartment communities and, more importantly, how they’ve convinced major healthcare payers that investing in a member’s housing stability is just as vital as any type of preventive healthcare. It’s a masterclass in scaling social impact through technology, and I think you’ll find this episode as inspiring as I did.
Catch the full conversation on Youtube, Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or scroll down for the transcript (auto-generated, so pardon any oddities – the bots are still learning!)
Jake Rothstein: Housing stability is not binary. It’s not you’re unhoused and now you’re gonna be housed. It’s you’re unhoused.
You’re probably unhoused for a number of reasons. What are those reasons and how are we solving for those in order to get you on a path towards stability and long-term stability?
Keren Etkin: We usually think of housing and healthcare as two separate industries, but providing housing stability can actually improve health outcomes. In this episode of the AgeTech podcast, Jake Rothstein, CEO and founder of Upside Breaks Down how they built a network that gets health payers to invest in housing stability without laying a single brick.
Jake, welcome to the show
Jake Rothstein: Thank you. Thank you for having me back.
Keren Etkin: So this is the second time you’ve been on the show.
I think the first time was during COVID, so quite a long time ago. And a lot
Jake Rothstein: Wow.
Indeed. I can’t believe it’s been that long. Wow. That’s crazy.
Keren Etkin: it, it has. So could you give us a, a recap of sort of the, the arc, the story arc of, of upside from five years ago until today
Jake Rothstein: Yeah, totally. I, it’s a long story, so I’ll shorten it for, for listeners. Perspectives. We started based on a personal need, right? My grandmother found herself alone at the age of 87. After having cared for my grandfather for a long time with Alzheimer’s. She wound up moving him to assisted living to memory care specifically, and found herself at 87 in this two story house that she could no longer maintain or afford or navigate.
She couldn’t walk up and down the stairs. She had recently had knee replacement surgery, and so. The impetus for Upside came from helping her with family got together and we said, okay, well she can no longer stay in this house. It’s not sustainable. She has equity in it, so let’s sell the house. Let’s take the equity, let’s move her to a rental apartment, and I’ll step in as the grandson.
That’s, you know, the closest by and. Help her out with the things that grandmothers need, help with transportation and groceries, and shop, you know, doctor’s appointments and things like that. And that’s what, what we started upside on that premise. We said, we’re gonna build the biggest senior living community in the world without laying a single brick.
And we’re gonna do that by utilizing existing apartment infrastructure, vetting it to ensure quality and accessibility and affordability for older adults specifically. We’ll create these great intergenerational communities because, you know, these buildings are inherently intergenerational. And you know, eventually we will work towards finding distribution through payers.
And that, that’s what we had done at Papa, and that’s what the intention was with upside. And so we started that like that and we started placing older adults
Keren Etkin: All.
Jake Rothstein: really all across the country, in in communities and apartments that we were, that were vetted by us. And so we started collab, you know, conglomerating, this network of vetted apartments, right?
And a couple years into it I think sooner than we anticipated, we started kind of loosely talking to payers. Medicare Advantage specifically. Medicare Advantage organizations and leaders started telling us like, well, this is an incredible concept and if you can build this national network of apartments, you can create housing stability programs and all this stuff.
But it was weird. It was weird timing. It was 2023 and there was a major pullback in supplemental benefits, which was the payment mechanism that we were gonna utilize to support the program specifically as it related to Medicare Advantage. And one thing led to another and we started wound up talking to a lot of Medicaid managed care organizations.
And so. When you’re talking to these big payers, right, they’re, they have managed care Medicaid, they have Medicare advantage organizations, they have commercial lines of business. So we hadn’t, at the time, in 2023, hadn’t had any real experience with vulnerable, lower income folks, Medicaid population.
But we said. You know, we’re willing to, we’re willing to try and see if we can use this kind of systematic way of understanding the real time pricing and floor plan and unit mix of all these apartments that are in our community and vetted as it relates to the populations that we serve. And so we had a conversation with one big national payer, and they had a state in Virginia, they had a, a health plan in Virginia where they said, well, we’ve got really challenging populations specifically in these three counties in this state, and we can find you some money and, you know, we can maybe put a, a put a pilot together.
And so in January of 2024, we launched our first payer pilot with a Medicaid managed care organization in Virginia. And within three months using this network of apartments that we had curated and vetted and sort of tailored to this Medicaid population that we knew we were gonna be serving we started stabilizing people housing, stabilizing them in a.
Within a three month period at rates that the health plan had never seen before. And in doing so, we had convinced, kind of along this journey, we had convinced the health plans that it made sense for them. To help get these members into stabilized settings and to pay for that because there was a clear and tangible ROI associated with it in, and the way that translates is to reduction in hospitalizations and reduction to fall risk, and reduction to, you know, emergency department visits and hospitalization, length of stays and medication adherence, and all these things that impact medical costs down the road.
And so that pilot wound up expanding across now seven states with one big national payer. We are working with all of the big national payers now over the course of the last two and a half years, the team has grown by, I can’t, we were, we started the year at nine, people we’re at 45 people. And it’s just been a, it’s been a wild journey and we’re just getting started.
Keren Etkin: Wow.
So I, I already knew that housing or housing stability was part of the social determinants of health, but I didn’t realize that payers were able to actually measure that. How long did it take you to show ROI? So
Jake Rothstein: So the way it works with payers is they need to be able to understand ROI from a theoretical or hypothetical standpoint at the launch of a program. But every payer also wants to understand the ROI as it relates to their specific population. Not a sample population, not a population that looks like their population, but their actual population.
That happens kind of over time and it’s continuing to happen with us. But what we did at the onset was we said, okay, well there’s all of these housing studies out there and that articulate and that show meaningful cost savings to the health to the healthcare system, to medical costs as a, as a result of stabilizing certainly the most vulnerable people, but even those that aren’t as vulnerable.
And what we found was that. S housing stability applies and is prevalent in a lot more people than we thought it was. For example, in Medicaid, 40% of members that we interact with have housing instability or we, we interact with a hundred percent of ’em. 40% of Medicaid members are flagged positive for housing instability.
Medicare,
Keren Etkin: Medicare, Medicare
Jake Rothstein: Medicare Advantage has almost similar numbers, and what we sort of realized was that the breadth of this problem is much bigger than we thought. And housing stability manifests itself in so many more ways than we thought it was. When we first started in Medicaid we were under the impression that housing instability is, you know, you’re homeless and you’re living under a bridge, or you’re you’re an addict, or you might have a, you know, a mental health issue.
The reality is, is that. People that are victims of abuse could have housing instability because they can’t stay where they’re at. Or maybe they’re living on their friend’s couch for the last three years
years
because they’ve had to move for medical reasons. Or maybe they’re they lost their job and they’re, they already got another job, but they don’t
but they
know where they’re gonna go in between.
And so they’re temporarily homeless. And so
so
the amount of reasons for that cause housing instability, the triggers for housing instability are, are very varied and the list is very long. It’s in the health plan’s best interest because they share the risk or they own the risk, they carry the risk for these patients to ensure that housing stability ensure it quickly and in and for the long term.
And so
so
we made that case with very clear and articulate, actuarily backed ROI modeling.
on
and we continue to make the case with identification of members that we help pulling claims in relation to those members and understanding over time how our program actually reduces claims.
Keren Etkin: I have a question that could be provocative or it could be just ignorant because I’m not American. Doesn’t it work better in the payer’s interest if the person becomes homeless and then they drop out of being a member?
Jake Rothstein: Not really. So the, the, the payer wants to keep the member the payer wants to keep the member because they get a capitated rate from the federal government in Medicaid. That’s how it works too. And a Medicare advantage, it works Similarly the Medicare Managed Care organization receives a payment for that member and for all of their members.
For every month that they’re in the system and they’re in their, you know that they’re under their care. And so, you know, these people are typically remaining in Medicaid or they’re remaining in Medicare Advantage, but their medical costs are reduced. Reduced. And so the idea is, let’s go upstream.
Let’s get ahead of. Claims because the only time that health plans really without programs like this, the only time health plans really see problems is through claims. And so they only see a problem after it’s already happened. So we go to them and we say, okay, we can survey members for housing instability.
You can survey them, whoever you want to survey. We can understand people that have any housing instability and capture rising risk within your population and nip those, those challenges early on. So that. You can find out about them before they wind up in your, you know, in your claims box. And before you incur major $40,000 hospital admissions for those members.
And so it is in very much alignment with the health plans, revenue goals, and profit goals to get upstream of so many of these. You know, kind of housing related issues that could potentially arise from housing instability, like I mentioned, fall risk and ED avoidance and all this stuff. So that’s why, and that’s why we’re getting a lot of you know, so much traction on the program.
Keren Etkin: That is wonderful. what did you have to change about the product when you Expanded your reach from not just Medicare, but to also serve Medicaid
Jake Rothstein: It’s a great question. So the type of housing that might be suitable for an older adult is different than the type of housing that might be suitable for someone that’s low income or someone with a disability. And so what we do is we take a very fine tooth comb and we understand the inventory in our network.
And our network spans now across the country, all 50 states and 33,000 apartment communities, plus a variety of. Different types of housing. We include section eight in our in our inventory. We have group homes in our inventory for people that have special, you know, specific, specific types of circumstances that might require that.
And so we’ve had to add a lot of types of housing that. Aren’t just suitable for older adults, but for all of these people, and you know, especially where it’s interesting is where the older adult and the lower income population coincide. These dual eligible, dually eligible members for both Medicare and Medicaid, those are really vulnerable members.
They’re very high cost to the health plan. And as a result, they’re very you know, hot. Are very hotly interested by the health plan to help stabilize from a housing perspective. So we’ve been really successful there as well in terms of the actual physical inventory, you know, for us. The process is very similar, so we’re running the same process on understanding and determining what inventory is suitable for an older adult or suitable for a Medicaid recipient.
It’s just a matter of, you know, filtering out one thing or another, dependent on the member’s specific needs. And everything’s very individualized that we do, and thankfully we have technology as a backbone of this that allows us to do this really quickly. And so what, what really is our secret sauces?
This proprietary network of inventory that we have real time visibility into that can provide these most vulnerable members among us access and advocacy to get them housed really quickly. Because if they’re walking off the street trying to find an apartment, you know, the, the kind of the knee jerk reaction from all of our clients at the very beginning of our interaction with them as well, there’s not enough affordable housing.
And what we say is, well, there’s also not a, a. You efficient utilization of the housing that exists. And the reason there’s not an efficient utilization of the housing that exists is because everything’s very pigeonholed. Everything’s very narrowly focused. The local section eight housing authority only sees what’s in their purview.
The local mom and pop landlord that has a multi, you know, multi-tenant apartment complex, they only see the availability in their purview. The case manager that works at the health plan that’s assigned to these members. Only has the ability to go apart to apartments.com or Zillow and see what’s locally available, if that’s even up to date.
And who knows if it meets the standards of that Medicaid member that has a low credit score or a criminal background or a mobility challenge. And so there is no to, until us, there is no centralized place to find real time information on inventory that relates to specific healthcare populations. And that’s what we’ve really done.
And, and that’s changed the game.
Keren Etkin: So how does it work in practice? Are you the, the landlord and the person is renting from you and then Medicare pays them? Or does Medicare or Medicaid pay you directly?
Jake Rothstein: Medicare, Medicaid pays us directly. And we’re not the landlord. We don’t actually carry risk on any of the apartments. There’s, you know, there’s an argument to be made where there’s an opportunity for us to do that, maybe down the road. But what we said is, let’s utilize this existing infrastructure.
Let’s be the facilitator, the advocates, the. The eyeballs, the eyes and ears to what’s available, and get these people the most vulnerable people into the most available housing near them, that’s affordable, that’s sustainable and let’s do that more efficiently and more quickly than anybody else can do it, including the health plans themself.
And so we are kind of that glue that, that keeps the whole system together and that allows the most vulnerable members to be most vulnerable members to be housed really quickly. The second part of that and, and I think the reason we provide a lot of value to our customers is the data piece. We track everything.
We track everything from the first interaction with our member to until the time that they’re housed, and then beyond the time that they’re housed to, to ensure that they stay housed long term. ’cause that’s a really. Also a really big problem. You can house someone and you might be able to house ’em temporarily, but the recidivism rates on becoming unhoused again for someone that’s housing unstable is are, they’re very high.
So they need consistent touches, they need consistent interactions, and they, those interactions need to be appropriate. They need to be timely, and they need to be relevant to the, to the member that we’re serving. And so. We can, you know, we can do that and we can provide the data back to the health plan that says, okay, here’s the justification for this program.
Here’s the reason. Here’s the kind of realtime ROI that you’re experiencing as a result of this missed DR visit or this primary care visit that happened as a result of our engagement with them. And so that data layer is a really important element of all of this that sits on top of the actual housing infrastructure.
Keren Etkin: Is retention. A big part of the incentive for Medicare Advantage, at least to work with you because if someone is on a specific Medicare Advantage plan and they have their housing paid for, and then maybe if they switch to another plan, they don’t work with you, so they have to find another apartment.
Jake Rothstein: Yeah, I, and I will let, I’ll clarify one point. We’re not actually, Medicare’s not paying for the rent. They’re paying for everything that’s ancillary to rent in some cases. In Medicaid specifically, we utilize what they call flex fund dollars. And flex fund dollars are dollars that sit at the health plan level, at the state level, at the health plan that are to be used, that are allowed to be used on things that are ancillary to rent.
Things like security, deposit assistance, things like rental payments and arrears, things like utility assistance. What we learned doing this is that, that so many of the barriers to stability for, for vulnerable members and for vulnerable people are those security deposits, right? Like, I can afford the rent, I can afford to make rent.
’cause my job, I barely can make it, but. I don’t have any money saved for a security deposit. I need $2,000. And the health plan historically has not been good at distributing those dollars. They don’t wanna give it to the member themselves because there’s, you know, trust issues there, and they don’t have the relationships with the landlords that we do.
So we become the fiduciary, the intermediary for those flex fund dollars. To the landlords themselves. And as a result of that, we unlock so many people from instability to stability by facilitating that those transactions and efficiently utilize those dollars that are just sitting on the sidelines, either unutilized or underutilized.
Today. So it’s a really important you know, it’s a really important element of our success and we see that applied through, you know, throughout, you mentioned retention, retention’s, incredibly important. Acquisition’s important on Medicare Advantage from a marketability standpoint. Using this program as a marketable asset for older adults that specifically know they’re coming into a period of their life where they might have to downsize or they might have to s look for an assisted living facility or a, some sort of senior living facility.
Those are really important selling points, but like you said, once they have the help with something that’s so important as housing from you know, an entity that’s associated with their health plan, stars ratings go up. H DDIs scores go up on the Medicaid side. Retention increases as long as we’re keeping them in the population, in the, you know, the plan area and the coverage area, which most of the time happens because we work to make that happen.
Yeah, all those things are a factor.
Keren Etkin: Is brilliant. so. What happens when someone sort of grows older? They’ve, they’ve been on Medicaid and now they’re older and they’re, they’re now they’re dually eligible. do they sort of check with you before they transition into Medicare to see the, whether Medicare works with you so they can stay in their current housing?
Jake Rothstein: Typically because the, because the member is paying the rent themselves, there typically isn’t an issue with that. So if they’re transitioning from straight Medicaid to being coming a dual eligible, their benefits only increase and they’re able to stay where they’re, when you know where they’re located.
So that’s typically not an issue where we do see interesting kind of transitions. And where we help with this is the transition from acute long-term for, from skilled nursing from an acute type of injury or recovery back to independent or more independent living situations. We work with a big payer, a big national payer in Florida.
On a transition from long-term care program. And essentially what that means is they have a population of older adults predominantly, that lives at, or has lived in a skilled nursing, A SNF facility for six months or more. And as you know, those skilled nursing facilities are incredibly expensive to the system that could be $3,000 a day for a very high level of care.
And in many cases, those members are ready and able and willing to transition out of those places, but they have nowhere to go. And they need an advocate and they need someone to help them. And their daughter lives in another country, or their son lives, you know, they don’t have kids. And so we work with those members to transition them out of skilled nursing into independent living or assisted living or even an, an apartment that they can manage on their own.
And we do that with really high levels of success. And then the reason is because not only do we have this network on the backbone on the backend. But we have the support of the payer. We have the support of the health plan to say, Hey, you know, hey, do you need transportation assistance to actually go on tours?
Or do you need non-medical emergency transport to get you from this SNF to the you know, to this facility? So there, there’s all of these nuances that payers are, can be so helpful with, but they can’t do it alone. Like they need to remove the housing or extract the housing components, the complexities of it out of their traditional case management kind of workflow.
In order to make everyone more efficient, their case managers become more efficient because now they’re just dealing with the behavioral health issues or the rehab issues or whatever it is. And we focus on the housing issues. Everyone works as a team together and can get things done a lot more efficiently and effectively and quickly.
Keren Etkin: Fascinating. So I wanna talk a little bit about the technology in the backend. I bet you have lots of AI in the backend, like everyone these days. Can you share a bit about sort of how that has helped you or become more efficient or, I dunno, produce better, more engaging user interfaces for users?
Jake Rothstein: Sure. So AI is everywhere. If you’re not using ai, you’re probably not in business in 2025. So that is the common theme. And the, the second common theme in healthcare specifically is. You really need humans in the mix. And humans in the mix is a very important thing, specifically as it relates to very vulnerable populations like in Medicare or Medicaid.
And so what we’ve done is we’ve put humans at the tip of the spear. We’ve said, okay, someone needs a, a helping hand, a shoulder cry on when they’re in a time of crisis or near crisis as it relates to their housing situation, the most, one of the most important things to their health. Humans engage and lead the relationship component of of the interaction with that and the engagement with that member.
AI handles the things that humans don’t want to do or aren’t really good or efficient at doing the administrative tasks, the algorithm matching the best of our inventory with the information from that member. Based on the intake call that we have with them, we’re listening to intake calls. We understand what’s going on.
We extract the data from those intake calls so that we’re automatically in the background searching for the appropriate community and appropriate department, the appropriate ancillary services that might support that engagement. So that. By the time the care guide gets off the initial call with a member, we already have an idea exactly where they’re gonna be going and how they’re gonna get there.
And things like the administrative tasks of ensuring that someone is on this journey towards housing instability. I think one of the things that we learned as we, as we’ve gone through this is. Not bin. Housing stability is not binary. It’s not you’re unhoused and now you’re gonna be housed. It’s you’re unhoused.
You’re probably unhoused for a number of reasons. What are those reasons and how are we solving for those in order to get you on a path towards stability and long-term stability? Because it’s one thing you could put someone in a shelter overnight because it’s raining and cold and you have kids and you’re hungry and all of these important things.
That’s okay, and that’s good and it’s important, but what are we doing to get that person full-time stably housed. Is it making sure that they have a job? Is it making sure that they’re in a drug rehab program? Is it making sure that they’re on disability insurance and if they can’t work, there’s all these things that have to happen in the background.
That’s why we have a, a team of experts that have knowledge from about housing, but they’re also social workers guided by, you know, a clinical team. To understand what’s clinical, what’s housing, how to separate the two and understand how to get people on this journey. So every single person gets a customized and dynamic housing plan after that first call that housing plan is used, and that’s ai, you know, facilitated.
That housing plan is used to guide the member towards housing stability if they come in at a point of complete instability. There’s people that come to us and they’re homeless, and there’s people that come to us in. If they’re temporarily unhoused and those look two, those paths are two very different paths.
Both lead to terrible outcomes from a medical cost standpoint. But both have very different solutions to get that member stabilized.
Keren Etkin: That is. So when time we spoke, way back when the company was still upside home, you are providing concierge services. Do you still do or some of that?
Jake Rothstein: So we made the decision to kind of wind down the consumer side of the business in 2020. Once we started seeing real traction on the payer side, we said, well, we wanna really focus on this distribution channel. And the reason was because we can make the impact so much bigger and so much faster with massive distribution.
And we have and so as of 2023 ish, we’ve sort of discontinued or, you know, moonlighted the consumer business and, and really work, you know. Predominantly, solely with health plans now. We’re also moving into as of about a couple months ago moving into the self-insured employer, self-funded employer space.
We see really, really big opportunities there to work with. ’cause housing is so fundamental, right? It’s fundamental for really. People of all walks of life, the most vulnerable, and even the people that aren’t as vulnerable, that are dealing with affordability challenges now from a housing perspective, gen Z is saving for their first house.
Good luck. It’s very hard. Anything that your employer might be able to contribute to or help with as it relates to that journey, getting to your first house is gonna be important. So we look at ourselves as kind of core housing support for. Pay government healthcare, but also employer sponsored healthcare and their employee, the employees that are kind of live within that system.
Keren Etkin: And is medical transportation something that you’re. Sort of assisting people with or considering to assist people with ’cause that could also reduce costs for the payers.
Jake Rothstein: Totally. What we found is housing. Using housing as a foundational kind of relationship driver with the member, you build trust really quickly and that enables, that trust, enables you to do and engage with the member on so many other things that are really they, they are tangential to, to, to housing.
Things like. Transportation, medical and non-emergency medical things like nutrition. We find all the time ourselves helping people enroll in SNAP benefits because we’ve realized that they’re eligible, but they’re not enrolled, and they can now take that $300 they were spending on food every month and allocate it towards housing.
And now, oh my God, the breadth of housing that you can afford in your local market becomes you know, the aperture widens as a result of having a little bit more disposable income that you could spend towards it. And so as housing’s gotten less and less affordable. It’s important to understand the ecosystem that a person lives within and the the resources that are available to them.
Transportation, food, all these other things included in order to unlock dollar more dollars for housing. And that’s what we’ve been able to do and stabilize a lot of people in the process of doing that. The, the, you know, advocacy is such a big portion of this, and again, like. Everyone wants to talk about AI being the, the advocate.
You need a human to be the advocate. AI can do so much of the heavy lifting but you really still need a human in loop. And I think that’s a lot of thing. That’s one thing that a lot of people don’t understand, a lot of companies don’t understand, especially working in this space. You build a really shiny object, a really great tool.
And those things can be very powerful, there’s no doubt about it. And you really have to be building those things. But humans people want to, people want to shoulder to cry on sometimes.
Keren Etkin: Absolutely 100%. What happens if someone of can afford their apartment at a certain point in time and then they lose their job and they can’t afford to pay rent anymore?
Jake Rothstein: We step in again. So typically we’re interacting and engaging with a member depending on the, on the type of agreement we have in place with whatever payer we’re working with. It’s either get them housed and ensure that housing stability short term or it’s get them housed and ensure that stability long term.
So that means that if something happens in the midst of our engagement with a member, either we’ll step right in to help. Whether that means finding them another place that is more affordable whether they don’t have a job, maybe that’s helping them with job retraining finding programs for them to do that.
Maybe it’s helping unlock other resources that could keep them housed for a while. Maybe it’s helping them find a roommate. There’s a lot of things that go on in the background that could help you know, in those types of situations. But typically they’re getting re-referred to us again through the health plan.
The way we typically plug in with health plans is through their case management teams. We launch, we educate case managers at a health plan that are assigned to these vulnerable members. We under, we let them understand about our pro, you know, teach ’em about the program and how they should refer members to us.
And then we just see referral of our volume just completely, you know. Go off the charts once we launch with a, you know, with a payer, because case managers are looking to offload a lot of this complex, you know, very complex housing work that they’re not experts at, and they don’t have the resources or the tools to be able to, you know, to, to execute on efficiently.
So it could go either way. Sometimes we’re either working with a member in real time and that happens and then we, we kind of fill the gaps and help, or the member goes back to the health plan. We’ve we’re completed with the initial engagement, and they come back around through case management and come back to us and we, you know, we, we get engaged to help again.
Keren Etkin: Have you had any instances when someone was employed, they could afford a specific apartment in a specific market and then they retire? They don’t have any retirement savings or enough retirement savings and social security, like it doesn’t cover any apartment in the existing market that they currently live in.
Do you like help them with relocation?
Jake Rothstein: Totally. We help them with all that stuff. We, and we’ve, we see, we’ve seen a lot, a lot of cases like this. Typically we wanna get ahead of it, right? If we’re moving them and stabilizing them and they’re close to retirement, we’ll have that conversation. We’ll understand what their goals are, what their.
Needs are. We’re, you know, we, everyone talks about whole person healthcare and really understanding holistically the, the kind of state of mind of the member. And we really, we live by that. We have conversations with members. It’s not, we’re not reading off a checklist. We’re not you know, there’s certain boxes we have to check and there’s certain things we probably have to ask in most cases.
But. We’re having conversations, we’re building trust. We’re understanding holistically what that person’s goals are, what they need to, what they want to achieve. And so if we can avoid those situations and get ahead of it and understand what that person’s retirement goals are, when they’re retiring, when they want to, you know, when they wanna transition out of where they’re living typically we can kind of get ahead of that.
There’s instances where we can’t and we have to deal with it at at, you know, in real time as well. In which case we’ll help them relocate, we’ll help them find you know, a more suitable place. We’ll help them move closer to family. That happens a lot. My daughter lives on the other side of town and I’m just too far away from her and the traffic, it’s 50 minutes and I don’t have a car and I can’t drive anymore and I just can’t be that far.
And so there’s things like that too. What we also work to do is. In the case that there is you know, tenant, landlord dispute or something that is fixable, potentially, we have, you know, a, a team of experts from a legal standpoint, from you know, from a working with older adult standpoint. We have people that are trained to help keep people in place.
’cause the ideal situation is to, if you, if you can in every way, keep someone in place and remove the disruption. Do that. But of course if, you know, in the event, in, in, in most cases that we deal with, ’cause there many of them are very far gone, people have to move. You know, we have the network to help them move and inventory.
You know, one of the questions we get all the time is like, well, is supply a real problem? Are, are you supply constrained at all? And the reality is, is because we’re capitalizing on the turnover of traditional, you know, of housing infrastructure supply really isn’t. An issue for us, we’re seeing the real time availability of any building.
So a building might be a 97% occupancy, but any given moment there might be three or four or five units available in that building. So it looks like a full building. If you were to walk across the street, it’s like, ah, there’s no inventory here. Everything, the market’s at seven 97% occupancy. But the reality is, is that people move in, they move out, they move in, they move out, they have life changes, there’s always some availability, and we’re finding that we’re making it available to the people that need it.
And we’re putting those two things together.
Keren Etkin: It sounds like a lot of what you’re doing is very high touch. How do you do all of that with a team of 45 people? I.
Jake Rothstein: A lot of automation. You mentioned technology early on. It’s very, very important to inter, you know, we’ve, we’ve had a tech, we’re a technology company, so we came at this with a technology driven mindset. From the very early start. We knew humans were gonna be important in the mix. But we also said if we don’t build technology sooner than later to facilitate so much of these sort of ancillary.
So that the care, we call ’em care guides. The care guides can manage the relationship. They just be the relationship person, build the trust. That’s all you should do. Everything else happens in the background. We’re not perfectly there yet, but we’re getting there. It’s a really critical component. And the idea is, is to continue to scale our impact without, you know, growing the team to be, you know, this.
Massive case management organization. That’s not what we are. We’re a technology company first. We have case managers on the team that facilitate these interactions and these engagements. These very high to, like you mentioned, high touch engagements with members. But when you think about it and you kind of peel the onion back a little, like what does it mean to stay engaged with a member?
It it, in so many cases, it’s automatable a quick check-in every month. People don’t wanna be bothered more than that if they’re set. They don’t really bother too much more than that. So it’s very easy to automate a lot of these things that you know, don’t necessarily need human touch, especially with ai.
I mean, this has gotten so much easier in the last few, few years and also so much cheaper to build and quicker to build. And so, you know, that’s, we’ve, we’ve taken advantage of that and I think it’s gonna help us scale our impact as we, you know, as we continue to see the demand from the market.
Keren Etkin: That makes a lot of sense. So what’s the, the big vision? Where do you hope to see upside in five or 10 years?
Jake Rothstein: That’s a great question. We think about, we think about this a lot you know, kind of overarching housing for health, right? Like, what does that mean? It means joining the housing industry, the real estate industry with the healthcare industry, getting those two ginormous, slow moving. Stodgy, you know, capital intensive industries to speak the same language because we don’t have a choice.
Number one is there’s 12,000 people, probably 13,000 people a day turning 65. Now they’re putting a tremendous burden on the healthcare system. That means they’re causing supply constraints on physicians and clinicians and nurses and caregivers for everybody else that might need that. That includes people on Medicaid, that includes people with disabilities.
If we don’t go upstream to try and solve some of these core social drivers of health housing, being in our argument, the most core and the most complex, if we don’t solve for those, nothing else matters. We’re not gonna be able to tackle all these other things. The system collapses on itself. And so, you know, long-term vision housing for healthcare, what does that mean?
It means. Working with payers, working with providers, working with health hospital systems, working with employers, touching every life that that deals with housing, because either you’re housed today or you’re gonna be housed tomorrow, or you gotta be, it’s, it touches everybody. And we want to be the go-to housing for health company and we are very quickly becoming that.
And yeah, I think that’s the, that’s the tech, that’s kind of the trajectory that we see ourselves on.
Keren Etkin: I, I’m sold on this vision for sure. So that was actually my last question. Is there anything else that we didn’t talk about that you would like to add? Any call to action to people in the audience?
Jake Rothstein: You know, I, again, this is something that crosses my mind a lot to get, try and get people in the industry thinking and speaking the same language as us. I, you know, one of the things we say is like, if, if we don’t do something who’s going to, and I, and. I think it’s there’s not one solution to fix all of these problems.
These are very, very big societal issues that we’re facing. And so it really needs to be an all hands on deck type of approach. We can tackle the housing piece of this but. We still need more affordable housing, we still need more, you know, regulatory changes so that we can build more of it because there’s not enough of it.
We need to figure out how to, how to, how to tackle the affordability issue at its core. Because while making things more efficient is really great, it’s still an incremental way of tackling, tackling a problem that is a monumental problem. And, you know, we think we can be a very big part of the solution but we’re not gonna be the only part of the solution.
So I think that. We need to, as a society, be thinking about where we should be allocating our tax dollars. Where should we be allocating our human capital to solve some of the biggest challenges of our time? And I believe I, I’m more optimistic every day that with AI and with. You know, really great people that are mission driven.
We can fix these things. These are not insurmountable problems, but they’re problems that are achievable. And but you gotta start, you gotta take the, you gotta take that first step. You gotta take the bite outta the, outta the elephant, so to speak.
Keren Etkin: Absolutely 100%. So, Jake, thank you so much for joining me on the show today. It was an absolute pleasure chatting with you as always and I wish you lots of success in continuing to build upside, it sounds like here, a lot of positive impact in this world.
Jake Rothstein: Thank you so much. It was so good to be here. Really good catching up with you and yeah, I’m excited about the future and I hope we can do this again soon.
Keren Etkin: We will for sure. Thank you.
If you enjoyed this conversation, there’s another video that YouTube thinks you might like right here. Until next time, stay humble, stay curious